Hi all,
Attached hereby you find an update of the TEQUILA SLS draft. I thank
several SLS-ers for the comments they sent me previously, especially
Christian Jacquenet for his numerous (and very nice) editing suggestions
:-)
My intention is to release the draft at the end of this week. So, we
have some time for discussion here - and then we move to the nsis
mailing list :-))
Regards,
Danny
Marcus Brunner wrote:
>
> Sure, actually I was surprised not to see a tequilla draft in NSIS so far.
> Marcus
>
> --On Friday, January 18, 2002 5:16 PM +0100 danny.goderis@alcatel.be wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> >
> > I have the intention to submit the SLS-TEQUILA draft (attached hereby)
> > to the recently new NSIS Working Group (NSIS = Next STeps in
> > Signalling).
> >
> > So, Let's revive our SLS-work! Folks, what do you think about this?
> >
> > NSIS working group:
> >
> > http://www-nrc.nokia.com/sua/nsis/NSIS.htm
> >
> >
> > To my opinion this could be an appropriate working group to discuss the
> > SLS issues.
> >
> > Most of the discussions in the NSIS working group are focusing on the
> > QoS signalling protocol requirements (e.g. something like RSVP "light").
> >
> > Although the NSIS mailing list people strongly put forward the
> > requirement about transparancy of QoS signalling messages (mechanism)
> > and the actual QoS information/objects carried by this messages there is
> > no proposal for the QoS-related information. Therefore I strongly have
> > the feeling that an appropriate template for the QoS-related
> > information, i.e. a Service Level Specification, is very much needed!
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Danny
>
> --------------------------------------
> Dr. Marcus Brunner
> Network Laboratories
> NEC Europe Ltd.
>
> E-Mail: brunner@ccrle.nec.de
> WWW: http://www.ccrle.nec.de/
> personal home page: http://www.brubers.org/marcus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon Jan 21 2002 - 18:15:59 CET