Hamid,
We are a not a WG yet and things are confuesing already.
I understand that tequila is working on an sls project
but who is supposed to own the standard? If SLS is
developed in an IETF-WG, wouldnt that mean it is owned
by the IETF? From RFC2026,
> 7.1.3 Assumption
>
> An IETF Working Group may start from an external specification and
> develop it into an Internet specification. This is acceptable if (1)
> the specification is provided to the Working Group in compliance with
> the requirements of section 10, and (2) change control has been
> conveyed to IETF by the original developer of the specification for
> the specification or for specifications derived from the original
> specification.
btw, what is the status of the charter?
regards
Abdallah
"Hamid.Asgari" wrote:
>
> Abdallah,
>
> Please don't get me wrong. I meant the SrNP is proposed (and being
> developed) by Tequila and I think it is not open yet. This doesn't mean
> that it won't be available to the WG. It is up to Tequila consortium to
> decide.
>
> Best regards,
> Hamid Asgari
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 09 2001 - 16:45:08 CEST