Dear Yves and Raju
What is not clear to me is if slsu wg is going to present general
solutions for SLS definition and negotiation or specific ones for
diffserv.
Previous discussions in this list let the impression people were looking
for solutions for diffserv. Presented drafts also directed their focus to
diffserv. Now, it seems the proposed charter is changing radically this
vision:
"As the architecture and negotiation framework for Service Level
negotiation is not particularly bound to IP networks, it is to be
understood that the procedures as discussed within the proposed WG are to
be extensible to optical networks (o-sls)."
So, if the outcomes of the group are not to be bound to any specific
technology and diffserv is just instantiation, then I think this should
be clear in the drafts. Otherwise, if it is to be bound to diffserv, then
the charter should be changed.
Carlos Kamienski
> Dear sls-subscripts,
>
> please find attached a proposed charter for the sls work (with a little
> delay, for which my apologies).
> The objective of sending it around is to gather feedback on the listed
> objectives and end-results, and as such all comments are warmly
> welcomed. We have covered in the charter what we felt had support during
> the last ietf meeting.
>
> Based upon the suggestions of this list, i will try to arrange a chat
> with the ops area directors on the subject during the minneapolis
> meeting.
>
> A new version of the framework draft, covering the technical remarks
> during the san diego bof, will be made available before the minneapolis
> meeting.
>
> further information can be found at
> http://www.ist-tequila.org/sls.html
>
> yves & raju
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 26 2001 - 10:20:26 CET