Hi
hereafter you will find some comments and questions on tthe SLS and usage
Framework.
best regards.
jeanpierre.garbisu@francetelecom.fr
* 1.0 : same comment as in the SLS draft on possible SLS locations.
* 2.0 : SLS, SLO : the protocol term should be defined in this fwk
context (i.e. a protocone beol for SLS negociation).
* 3.2 : perhaps use transport sub-domains instead of sub-transport
domains.
* 3.2 : a scheme should clarify the last paragraph (protection of
denial of service).
* 4.0 : traffic engineering : it seems it's the first time diffserv is
mentionned. Perhaps the position of the fwk draft wrt the (not only to be
considered?) diffserv underlying network technology could be developped
before (in section 2 ? or in a basic assumptions section).
* 4.0 : one before last paragraph : the "dual" concept seems not
clearly described.
* 4.0 : last paragraph : diffserv signalling through DSCP could be
mentionned too (cf. the recent diffserv traffic marking policies thread)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 08 2000 - 16:52:07 CET