Hi Yves
> thanks for this introductory text on well known services.
> I would guess that if the result of work on SLS templates would not be
> adequate to capture the description of any well known service as you
> have examplified, then it would not be complete.
I don't think so, but of course WKSs would introduce more overhead that
maybe the experience may prove unnecessary.
> I do not rule out any extensions to the SLS template to support WKS,
> however, i am afraid that it would prove unscalable in the end, since
> anybody wanting to add a new WKS should pass the IETF or any other way
> of ever lasting documentation body, to have a WKS to be well known, and
> get ICANN to give it an identifier of any sort.
The same reasoning could be applied to, e.g., DSCPs (although they are
essential to diffserv).
Carlos
>
> any other opinions ?
>
> yves
>
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Carlos Kamienski
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Name: well_known_services.txt
> > well_known_services.txt Type: Plain Text (TEXT/PLAIN)
> > Encoding: BASE64
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 03 2000 - 13:00:53 CET