Carlos Alberto Kamienski wrote:
>
> Since I have introduced the discussion about well known services,
> I am presenting (in an attached txt file) more clearly my opinion about
> this topic, reflecting ideas expressed in the list as well. It is, in
> fact, an attempt to discuss this topic and check if well known services
> are really necessary (they are, in my opinion, and not just to simplify
> the negotiation of SLSs).
Hi Carlos,
thanks for this introductory text on well known services.
I would guess that if the result of work on SLS templates would not be
adequate to capture the description of any well known service as you
have examplified, then it would not be complete.
I do not rule out any extensions to the SLS template to support WKS,
however, i am afraid that it would prove unscalable in the end, since
anybody wanting to add a new WKS should pass the IETF or any other way
of ever lasting documentation body, to have a WKS to be well known, and
get ICANN to give it an identifier of any sort.
any other opinions ?
yves
>
> Regards
>
> Carlos Kamienski
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: well_known_services.txt
> well_known_services.txt Type: Plain Text (TEXT/PLAIN)
> Encoding: BASE64
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 03 2000 - 12:42:03 CET