Re: [tequila/sls] predefined services / SLS ?

From: Jaroslaw Sydir (sydir@cplane.com)
Date: Thu Nov 02 2000 - 18:12:53 CET

  • Next message: Raju Rajan: "Re: [tequila/sls] predefined services / SLS ?"

    Panos,

    My point was that if a carrier doesn't like the notion of a truely best effort service,
    then he can define a service in which the traffic gets some level of guarantee. This
    service level can be used to engineer trunks for best effort traffic providing a best
    effort service that is "slightly better than (strictly) best effort.

    Jerry

    Panos Trimintzios wrote:

    > Dear Jerry hi,
    >
    > On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Jaroslaw Sydir wrote:
    >
    > -Michael,
    > -
    > -I'm not sure that I understand your question. If the traffic is truely
    > -best effort then it requires no guarantees and you don't care about it
    > -in your traffic engineering. It gets the lowest priority in the network
    > -and is dropped in favor of the guaranteed traffic.
    >
    > Even if the traffic is "truely best effort" as you mention above you DO
    > care about it in the traffic engineering of your network, since you do not
    > want this type of service to be starved. This means that wnen you engineer
    > your AS you should always try to keep some of its resources "free" to be
    > used by BE traffic.
    >
    > -If you want to provide a "slightly better than best effort" service,
    >
    > What do you mean "slightly better than best effort"? Couldn't this type of
    > service offering handled by a qualitative (or another)SLS? So if you name
    > this as the "lowest of Olympic Services" or "slightly better than best
    > effort" does it make much difference? I don't know in general but when it
    > comes to engineering again it doesn't.
    >
    > cheers,
    >
    > PanOS
    >
    > -then this implies some level of performance guarantees for some amount
    > -of this traffic. In this case you would describe it in terms of
    > -individual e2e SLS just like the other types of services.
    > -
    > -Jerry
    > -
    > -
    > -Michael Smirnov wrote:
    > ->
    > -> On Wed Nov 1 00:51:41 2000 Jaroslaw Sydir wrote:
    > ->
    > -> > Jean-Pierre and Pierrick,
    > -> >
    > -> > A traffic matrix (network wide SLS) can be specified as a set of individual e2e
    > -> > SLS/services (represending the trunks that make up the traffic matrix).
    > -> <...>
    > ->
    > -> How you plan to specify best effort traffic?
    > ->
    > -> cheers
    > ->
    > -> Michael
    > -
    >
    > =======================================================
    > Panos Trimintzios
    > Research Fellow, Networks Research Group
    > Centre for Communication Systems Research (CCSR)
    > Univ. of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, U.K.
    > Office: U37 / BA Building
    > Tel: +44 (0)1483 876005 Fax: +44 (0)1483 876011
    > Email: <p.trimintzios@eim.surrey.ac.uk>
    > WWW: <http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/CCSR/Networks>
    > =======================================================



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 02 2000 - 18:15:02 CET