Jean-Pierre and Pierrick,
A traffic matrix (network wide SLS) can be specified as a set of individual e2e
SLS/services (represending the trunks that make up the traffic matrix). It would
be very useful if the SLS " language" could be used for both purposes.
In an earlier note in this thread, Pierrick Cheval questioned whether the draft
should be narrowed to cover only Diffserv. In my opinion, this work is more
general than just diffserv. The Service level Specification "language" should
not be dependent on the network technology used to provide the services.
Jerry Sydir
GARBISU Jean-Pierre FTRD/DMI/CAE wrote:
> Hi Yves
> what about TE?
> doesn't it seem more feasible to base TE on network wide SLSs needs instead
> of e2e SLS/services?
> TE can't be as dynamic as e2e services...
> cheers
>
> jeanpierre.garbisu@francetelecom.fr
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 01 2000 - 00:47:47 CET