Hi Yves
what about TE?
doesn't it seem more feasible to base TE on network wide SLSs needs instead
of e2e SLS/services?
TE can't be as dynamic as e2e services...
cheers
jeanpierre.garbisu@francetelecom.fr
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Yves T'Joens [mailto:yves.tjoens@alcatel.be]
Envoyé : jeudi 26 octobre 2000 21:36
À : sls@ist-tequila.org
Objet : Re: [tequila/sls] predefined services / SLS ?
Stefano Salsano wrote:
hi Stefano, Jean Pierre,
The thing we are trying to do is to describe how a (transport) service
may be negotiated at the edge of a network, not particularly how the
provider is to implement his network to honour the request. If the
provider chooses to only offer a discrete set of parameters, and
associated values, than that is perfectly possible. In fact, allowing
provider differentiation at this level is a key requirement.
However it should not limit the complexity with which services could be
defined at the edge of the network,
cheers
Yves
>
> Dear Jean-Pierre,
>
> see my comments below !
>
> GARBISU Jean-Pierre FTRD/DMI/CAE wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> > About the "Network Services", even if it doesn't (perhaps) fit exactly
what
> > S. Salsano have in mind, I would like to add the following :
> > IMHO these network services are essential.
> > I can't see how any kind of customers'e2e SLSs could be individually
> > processed in the backbones supporting QoS services.
> >
> > To give an example, VoIP. One could imagine that all customers of an ISP
> > don't ask for exactly the same SLS's metrics e.g some customers ask for
100
> > ms OWD between their CPEs, others ask for 80 ms, other for 120 etc
(based on
> > different gateways needs, different access lines speeds etc.). The ISP
could
> > decide to implement only one VoIP network service wrt the OWD metric
(e.g.
> > 50 ms) between its PoPs instead of implementing (within all its backbone
QoS
> > toolbox : TC, TE, etc.) 3 VoIP OWD metrics. The "generic" network
service in
> > the core permits to handle varied specific e2e SLS.
> >
> > Another example could be ERP applications (e.g. transactional business
> > critical applications). All customers don't share the same ERP apps but
> > generally one could imagine that customers could ask for a prioritized
e2e
> > QoS service for them (e.g. somewhere between real time needs and best
effort
> > needs; OWD varying between a few hundred ms and a few secondes). The ISP
> > could decide to implement one or two generic ERP network services which
> > should cover the needs of a large variety of customers applications
instead
> > of trying to implement specific PoP to PoP service per ERP type.
> >
> > Finally it seems well established that the closer you get from the core
> > networks, the fewer CoS (if ever) and dynamicity you should consider,
> > compared to greater variety of CoS and dynamicity you can try to
implement
> > at the access.
> > That's why mapping of (possibly numerous) e2e SLS on (few) PoP to PoP
> > network services seems very attractive.
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > jeanpierre.garbisu@francetelecom.fr
> >
>
> I agree with your opionion... in the core you'll have definitely
> few CoS or few "(Core) Network services".
>
> Note that I do not think that you should exactly reflect
> this set of (Core) Network Service in a set of Network
> Service in the access SLS.
>
> You have "customers'e2e SLSs" at the access, and then you have
> to map into your "(Core) network services".
>
> This mapping process can be complicated if the SLS contains a lot
> of parameters, and the user can freely select any combination
> of values for these parameters. The mapping process can be
> simplified if a set of "predefined SLS patterns" is defined.
>
> I think the right approach should be to define the semantic
> content of the SLS in a very complete way, with the needed
> set of parameters and options... which will end in a complex SLS.
> Then the use of predefined SLS patterns is an (optional)
> way to simplify the operation.
>
> Best regards,
> Stefano
>
> --
> *******************************************************************
> Stefano Salsano
> CoRiTeL - Consorzio di Ricerca sulle Telecomunicazioni
>
> E-mail : salsano@coritel.it URL : http://www.coritel.it
> Tel. : +39 06 20410029 Address : Via di Tor Vergata, 135
> Fax. : +39 06 20410037 00133 Roma - ITALY
> *******************************************************************
-- +------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Yves T'Joens | | Project Manager Internet Access and Edge | | Network Strategy Group | | Francis Wellesplein, 1 phone : +32 (0)3 240 7890 | | 2018 Antwerp fax : +32 (0)3 240 9932 | | Belgium email: yves.tjoens@alcatel.be | +------------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 27 2000 - 17:25:40 CEST