Stefano Salsano wrote:
>
> Michael Smirnov wrote:
> >
> > Hi Stefano,
> >
> > On Wed Oct 25 17:35:17 2000 Stefano Salsano wrote:
> >
> > > Basically we have 4 Network Services which we have called:
> > > Premium CBR
> > > Premium VBR
> > > Premium "Mission Critical"
> > > Premium Multimedia
> >
> > okay - I have no problem with the above, but these are not
> > "well known services" advocated in this thread earlier. Those
> > were intended to be end-user services, imo.
> >
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> It's not clear what you mean with "end-user" service.
> In fact we use these services as something that a network
> operator sells... and someone buys, so that they are
> subject to an SLS.
>
> The SLS could contain:
>
> Delay < 100 ms
> Drop = 0%
> Rate = 10 Mbit/s
>
> Or, if the network operator offer a "Premium CBR" service
> which gives Delay < 100 ms, Drop 0% and the buyer is
> aware of this service, the SLS could be:
>
> Premium CBR
> Rate = 10 Mbit/s
>
> This is for me a predefined SLS pattern... just an
> (optional) mechanism for the simplification of the SLSs.
>
so every premium CBR that will be sold will be fixed with the same
transport properties ? e.g., delay <100ms ?
doesn't seem very flexible.
y.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 27 2000 - 16:22:15 CEST