Re: [tequila/sls] predefined services / SLS ?

From: Yves T'Joens (yves.tjoens@alcatel.be)
Date: Thu Oct 26 2000 - 21:36:12 CEST

  • Next message: Yves T'Joens: "Re: [tequila/sls] predefined services / SLS ?"

    Stefano Salsano wrote:

    hi Stefano, Jean Pierre,

    The thing we are trying to do is to describe how a (transport) service
    may be negotiated at the edge of a network, not particularly how the
    provider is to implement his network to honour the request. If the
    provider chooses to only offer a discrete set of parameters, and
    associated values, than that is perfectly possible. In fact, allowing
    provider differentiation at this level is a key requirement.
    However it should not limit the complexity with which services could be
    defined at the edge of the network,

    cheers
    Yves

    >
    > Dear Jean-Pierre,
    >
    > see my comments below !
    >
    > GARBISU Jean-Pierre FTRD/DMI/CAE wrote:
    > >
    > > Hi
    > > About the "Network Services", even if it doesn't (perhaps) fit exactly what
    > > S. Salsano have in mind, I would like to add the following :
    > > IMHO these network services are essential.
    > > I can't see how any kind of customers'e2e SLSs could be individually
    > > processed in the backbones supporting QoS services.
    > >
    > > To give an example, VoIP. One could imagine that all customers of an ISP
    > > don't ask for exactly the same SLS's metrics e.g some customers ask for 100
    > > ms OWD between their CPEs, others ask for 80 ms, other for 120 etc (based on
    > > different gateways needs, different access lines speeds etc.). The ISP could
    > > decide to implement only one VoIP network service wrt the OWD metric (e.g.
    > > 50 ms) between its PoPs instead of implementing (within all its backbone QoS
    > > toolbox : TC, TE, etc.) 3 VoIP OWD metrics. The "generic" network service in
    > > the core permits to handle varied specific e2e SLS.
    > >
    > > Another example could be ERP applications (e.g. transactional business
    > > critical applications). All customers don't share the same ERP apps but
    > > generally one could imagine that customers could ask for a prioritized e2e
    > > QoS service for them (e.g. somewhere between real time needs and best effort
    > > needs; OWD varying between a few hundred ms and a few secondes). The ISP
    > > could decide to implement one or two generic ERP network services which
    > > should cover the needs of a large variety of customers applications instead
    > > of trying to implement specific PoP to PoP service per ERP type.
    > >
    > > Finally it seems well established that the closer you get from the core
    > > networks, the fewer CoS (if ever) and dynamicity you should consider,
    > > compared to greater variety of CoS and dynamicity you can try to implement
    > > at the access.
    > > That's why mapping of (possibly numerous) e2e SLS on (few) PoP to PoP
    > > network services seems very attractive.
    > >
    > > Best regards.
    > >
    > > jeanpierre.garbisu@francetelecom.fr
    > >
    >
    > I agree with your opionion... in the core you'll have definitely
    > few CoS or few "(Core) Network services".
    >
    > Note that I do not think that you should exactly reflect
    > this set of (Core) Network Service in a set of Network
    > Service in the access SLS.
    >
    > You have "customers'e2e SLSs" at the access, and then you have
    > to map into your "(Core) network services".
    >
    > This mapping process can be complicated if the SLS contains a lot
    > of parameters, and the user can freely select any combination
    > of values for these parameters. The mapping process can be
    > simplified if a set of "predefined SLS patterns" is defined.
    >
    > I think the right approach should be to define the semantic
    > content of the SLS in a very complete way, with the needed
    > set of parameters and options... which will end in a complex SLS.
    > Then the use of predefined SLS patterns is an (optional)
    > way to simplify the operation.
    >
    > Best regards,
    > Stefano
    >
    > --
    > *******************************************************************
    > Stefano Salsano
    > CoRiTeL - Consorzio di Ricerca sulle Telecomunicazioni
    >
    > E-mail : salsano@coritel.it URL : http://www.coritel.it
    > Tel. : +39 06 20410029 Address : Via di Tor Vergata, 135
    > Fax. : +39 06 20410037 00133 Roma - ITALY
    > *******************************************************************

    -- 
    +------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Yves T'Joens                                                     |
    | Project Manager Internet Access and Edge                         |
    | Network Strategy Group                                           |
    | Francis Wellesplein, 1         phone : +32 (0)3 240 7890         |
    | 2018 Antwerp                   fax : +32 (0)3 240 9932           |
    | Belgium                        email: yves.tjoens@alcatel.be     |
    +------------------------------------------------------------------+
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 27 2000 - 16:21:39 CEST