Re: [tequila/sls] comments on the TEQUILA draft by W. Almesberger

From: Huan Pham (huan@cs.jcu.edu.au)
Date: Tue Oct 17 2000 - 10:04:21 CEST

Next message: Marcus Brunner: "Re: [tequila/sls] comments on the TEQUILA draft by W. Almesberger"

Previous message: Yves T'Joens: "Re: [tequila/sls] comments on the TEQUILA draft by W. Almesberger"
In reply to: Yves T'Joens: "Re: [tequila/sls] comments on the TEQUILA draft by W. Almesberger"
Next in thread: Raju Rajan: "Proposed SLS draft from AT&T"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>
> 3.1, general.
> Typical SLAs in use today include geographic references like "no more
> than X ms RTT to any of our routers in Europe". Example:
> http://www.uk.uu.net/customerservices/sla/tandcs/
>
> Such specifications are probably too difficult to express in a general
> formal way, so the current approach of ignoring them seems
> appropriate.
>

This is one of the SLS stated for 1xN communication, isn't it ?? Why is it
difficult?

Your routers in Europe can be specified as a set of IP addresses.

Next message: Marcus Brunner: "Re: [tequila/sls] comments on the TEQUILA draft by W. Almesberger"
Previous message: Yves T'Joens: "Re: [tequila/sls] comments on the TEQUILA draft by W. Almesberger"
In reply to: Yves T'Joens: "Re: [tequila/sls] comments on the TEQUILA draft by W. Almesberger"
Next in thread: Raju Rajan: "Proposed SLS draft from AT&T"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 17 2000 - 10:10:37 CEST